↓ Skip to main content

Circularly permuted TRAIL plus thalidomide and dexamethasone versus thalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Circularly permuted TRAIL plus thalidomide and dexamethasone versus thalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00280-017-3310-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Leng, Jian Hou, Jie Jin, Mei Zhang, Xiaoyan Ke, Bin Jiang, Ling Pan, Linhua Yang, Fang Zhou, Jianmin Wang, Zhao Wang, Li Liu, Wei Li, Zhixiang Shen, Lugui Qiu, Naibai Chang, Jianyong Li, Jing Liu, Hongyan Pang, Haitao Meng, Peng Wei, Hua Jiang, Yan Liu, Xiangjun Zheng, Shifang Yang, Wenming Chen

Abstract

Circularly permuted TRAIL (CPT) has exhibited promising efficacy as a mono-therapy or in combination with thalidomide for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this phase 2 study, the safety and efficacy of CPT in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone (CPT + TD) was evaluated in patients with pretreated relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Patients who received at least two previous therapies for MM were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with CPT + TD or thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Overall, 47 patients were assigned to the CPT + TD group, and 24 patients were recruited to the TD group. The ORR in the CPT + TD group was 38.3 vs. 25.0% in the TD group. The median PFS time was 6.7 months for the CPT + TD group and 3.1 months for the TD group. The median DORs for the CPT + TD and TD groups were 7.1 and 3.2 months, respectively. Most of the adverse effects (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. Serious AEs were reported in 19.7% of the patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. CPT plus TD could serve as a new therapeutic strategy for patients with RRMM. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled confirmatory study is currently under way.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,378,098
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#1,810
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,955
of 311,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.