Title |
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel McEvoy, Luciana Ballini, Susanna Maltoni, Catherine A O’Donnell, Frances S Mair, Anne MacFarlane |
Abstract |
There is a well-recognized need for greater use of theory to address research translational gaps. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a set of sociological tools to understand and explain the social processes through which new or modified practices of thinking, enacting, and organizing work are implemented, embedded, and integrated in healthcare and other organizational settings. This review of NPT offers readers the opportunity to observe how, and in what areas, a particular theoretical approach to implementation is being used. In this article we review the literature on NPT in order to understand what interventions NPT is being used to analyze, how NPT is being operationalized, and the reported benefits, if any, of using NPT. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 28 | 39% |
Australia | 5 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 44% |
Scientists | 30 | 42% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 512 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 20% |
Student > Master | 99 | 19% |
Researcher | 86 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 4% |
Other | 73 | 14% |
Unknown | 115 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 87 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 13% |
Psychology | 43 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 36 | 7% |
Other | 64 | 12% |
Unknown | 140 | 27% |