↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus recommendations
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-7209-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seema Kalra, Alan Silman, Gulsen Akman-Demir, Saeed Bohlega, Afshin Borhani-Haghighi, Cris S. Constantinescu, Habib Houman, Alfred Mahr, Carlos Salvarani, Petros P. Sfikakis, Aksel Siva, Adnan Al-Araji

Abstract

Neuro-Behçet's disease (NBD) is one of the more serious manifestations of Behçet's disease (BD), which is a relapsing inflammatory multisystem disease with an interesting epidemiology. Though NBD is relatively uncommon, being potentially treatable, neurologists need to consider it in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory, infective, or demyelinating CNS disorders. Evidence-based information on key issues of NBD diagnosis and management is scarce, and planning for such studies is challenging. We therefore initiated this project to develop expert consensus recommendations that might be helpful to neurologists and other clinicians, created through an extensive literature review and wide consultations with an international advisory panel, followed by a Delphi exercise. We agreed on consensus criteria for the diagnosis of NBD with two levels of certainty in addition to recommendations on when to consider NBD in a neurological patient, and on the use of various paraclinical tests. The management recommendations included treatment of the parenchymal NBD and cerebral venous thrombosis, the use of disease modifying therapies, prognostic factors, outcome measures, and headache in BD. Future studies are needed to validate the proposed criteria and provide evidence-based treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 301 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 18%
Other 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Student > Master 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 78 25%
Unknown 66 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 53%
Neuroscience 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 75 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,855,488
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#284
of 4,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,834
of 306,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.