↓ Skip to main content

Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the diagnosis of banana bunchy top virus in different banana cultivars

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the diagnosis of banana bunchy top virus in different banana cultivars
Published in
Archives of Virology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00705-017-3399-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reetika Kapoor, Nishant Srivastava, Shailender Kumar, R. K. Saritha, Susheel Kumar Sharma, Rakesh Kumar Jain, Virendra Kumar Baranwal

Abstract

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a rapid, isothermal amplification method with high specificity and sensitivity. In this study, an assay was developed and evaluated for the detection of banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) in infected banana plants. Three oligonucleotide primer pairs were designed from the replicase initiator protein gene sequences of BBTV to function both in RPA as well as in polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A total of 133 symptomatic as well as asymptomatic banana leaf samples from various cultivars were collected from the different regions of India and evaluated for BBTV infection using the RPA assay. BBTV was efficiently detected using crude leaf sap in RPA and the results obtained were consistent with PCR-based detection using purified DNA as template. To our knowledge, this is the first report of reliable diagnosis of BBTV infection by RPA using crude leaf sap as a template.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 26%
Unspecified 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 32 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#3,411
of 4,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,050
of 310,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#58
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.