↓ Skip to main content

Sleep in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
Title
Sleep in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0782-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret C. Souders, Stefanie Zavodny, Whitney Eriksen, Rebecca Sinko, James Connell, Connor Kerns, Roseann Schaaf, Jennifer Pinto-Martin

Abstract

The purposes of this paper are to provide an overview of the state of the science of sleep in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), present hypotheses for the high prevalence of insomnia in children with ASD, and present a practice pathway for promoting optimal sleep. Approximately two thirds of children with ASD have chronic insomnia, and to date, the strongest evidence on promoting sleep is for sleep education, environmental changes, behavioral interventions, and exogenous melatonin. The Sleep Committee of the Autism Treatment Network (ATN) developed a practice pathway, based on expert consensus, to capture best practices for screening, identification, and treatment for sleep problems in ASD in 2012. An exemplar case is presented to integrate key constructs of the practice pathway and address arousal and sensory dysregulation in a child with ASD and anxiety disorder. This paper concludes with next steps for dissemination of the practice pathway and future directions for research of sleep problems in ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 362 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Master 35 10%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 116 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 18%
Psychology 56 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Neuroscience 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 144 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,036,923
of 25,504,429 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#351
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,625
of 324,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,504,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.