↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for two distinct phenotypes of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Evidence for two distinct phenotypes of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Diabetologia, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00125-017-4251-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Penno, Eleonora Russo, Monia Garofolo, Giuseppe Daniele, Daniela Lucchesi, Laura Giusti, Veronica Sancho Bornez, Cristina Bianchi, Angela Dardano, Roberto Miccoli, Stefano Del Prato

Abstract

In a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, single-centre study, we assessed the prevalence and correlates of different CKD phenotypes (with and without albuminuria) in a large cohort of patients of white ethnicity with type 1 diabetes. From 2001 to 2009, 408 men and 369 women with type 1 diabetes (age 40.2 ± 11.7 years, diabetes duration 19.4 ± 12.2 years, HbA1c 7.83 ± 1.17% [62.0 ± 12.9 mmol/mol]) were recruited consecutively. Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and eGFR (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) were obtained for all individuals, together with CKD stage. Diabetic retinopathy and peripheral polyneuropathy were detected in 41.5% and 8.1%, respectively, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) occurred in 8.5%. Adjudications of CKD phenotype were made by blinded investigators. Normo- (ACR <3.4), micro- (ACR 3.4-34) or macroalbuminuria (ACR ≥34 mg/mmol) were present in 91.6%, 6.4% and 1.9% of individuals, respectively. eGFR categories 1 (≥90 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2)), 2 (60-89 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2)) and 3 (<60 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2)) were present in 57.3%, 39.0% and 3.7%, respectively. The majority of participants had no CKD (89.4%), while stages 1-2 and ≥3 CKD were detected in 6.8% and 3.7%, respectively. The albuminuric (Alb(+)) and non-albuminuric (Alb(-)) phenotypes were present in 12 (41.4%) and 17 (58.6%) individuals with stage ≥3 CKD, respectively. Individuals with an ACR <3.4 mg/mmol were subdivided into those with normal albuminuria (<1.1 mg/mmol; 77.2%) and mildly increased albuminuria (1.1-3.4 mg/mmol; 14.4%), and individuals with stage 2 CKD were subdivided into those with eGFR 75-89 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2) and 60-74 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2). ACR <3.4 mg/mmol (88.7%) and even <1.1 mg/mmol (70.4%) were common in individuals with eGFR 60-74 ml min(-1) [1.73 m](-2). The prevalence of ACR <1.1 mg/mmol was lower but still significant (34.5%) in those with stage ≥3 CKD. In logistic regression analysis, stages 1-2 and ≥3 CKD were independently associated with age, HbA1c, γ-glutamyltransferase, fibrinogen, hypertension, but not with sex, BMI, smoking, HDL-cholesterol or triacylglycerol. Inclusion of advanced retinopathy removed HbA1c from the model. The CKD Alb(+) phenotype correlated with diabetes duration, HbA1c, HDL-cholesterol, fibrinogen and hypertension, while the CKD Alb(-) phenotype was associated with age and hypertension, but not with diabetes duration, HbA1c and fibrinogen. The Alb(-) CKD phenotype is present in a significant proportion of individuals with type 1 diabetes supporting the hypothesis of two distinct pathways (Alb(+) and Alb(-)) of progression towards advanced kidney disease in type 1 diabetes. These are probably distinct pathways as suggested by different sets of covariates associated with the two CKD phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,526,882
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#813
of 5,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,143
of 324,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#18
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.