↓ Skip to main content

足部蒸しタオル温罨法が生体に及ぼす生理学的効果

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
足部蒸しタオル温罨法が生体に及ぼす生理学的効果
Published in
Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science, August 2012
DOI 10.18892/jsnas.11.2_4
Authors

金子 健太郎, 尾形 優, 熊谷 英樹, 山本 真千子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,374,075
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science
#4
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,883
of 179,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Nursing Art and Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them