↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Upper Limb Therapies for Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
578 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Upper Limb Therapies for Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Meta-analysis
Published in
Pediatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.1542/peds.2013-0675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne Sakzewski, Jenny Ziviani, Roslyn N. Boyd

Abstract

Children with unilateral cerebral palsy present with impaired upper limb (UL) function affecting independence, participation, and quality of life and require effective rehabilitation. This study aims to systematically review the efficacy of nonsurgical upper limb therapies for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 570 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 117 20%
Student > Bachelor 85 15%
Researcher 47 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 8%
Other 32 6%
Other 105 18%
Unknown 145 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 135 23%
Neuroscience 27 5%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 68 12%
Unknown 174 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,282,324
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#3,907
of 16,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,463
of 306,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#64
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.