↓ Skip to main content

Total hip replacement in patients with Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Total hip replacement in patients with Parkinson's disease
Published in
International Orthopaedics, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00264-001-0308-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Weber, Miguel E. Cabanela, Franklin H. Sim, Frank J. Frassica, Scott W. Harmsen

Abstract

From 1970 to 1994, 107 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) were performed in 98 patients with Parkinson's disease. The average age of the patients was 72 years. Preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthrosis in 58 hips, failed endoprosthesis in 19, aseptic loosening in ten, femoral neck fracture in 18, and other diagnoses in two. Milder neurological stages I-III were assigned to 96 patients, and tendon release for contracture was performed in eight patients. Of the 38 complications eight were urinary tract infections and six dislocations. Of these 15 occurred in the 58 primary THAs and 23 in the 49 nonprimary THAs. In patients with primary THAs there were no dislocations; however, one of the four postoperative deaths occurred following primary THA. We followed 75 hips for 7 (2-21) years; 51 patients had died by the time of the study. Neurological status deteriorated over time with 57% of patients progressing to functional stages IV or V, although consistent improvement was noted for pain relief. Function was directly related to the stage of the neurological disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 19%
Other 8 15%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,613,993
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#114
of 1,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,056
of 129,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them