↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary processes in populations of Cryptosporidium inferred from gp60 sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Evolutionary processes in populations of Cryptosporidium inferred from gp60 sequence data
Published in
Parasitology Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00436-017-5459-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan C. Garcia-R, David T. S. Hayman

Abstract

Cryptosporidiosis is one of the most common human infectious diseases globally. The gp60 gene has been adopted as a key marker for molecular epidemiological investigations into this protozoan disease because of the capability to characterize genotypes and detect variants within Cryptosporidium species infecting humans. However, we know relatively little about the potential spatial and temporal variation in population demography that can be inferred from this gene beyond that it is recognized to be under selective pressure. Here, we analyzed the genetic variation in time and space within two putative populations of Cryptosporidium in New Zealand to infer the processes behind the patterns of sequence polymorphism. Analyses using Tajima's D, Fu, and Li's D* and F* tests show significant departures from neutrality in some populations and indicate the selective maintenance of alleles within some populations. Demographic analyses showed distortions in the pattern of the genetic variability caused by high recombination rates and population expansion, which was observed in case notification data. Our results showed that processes acting on populations that have similar effects can be distinguished from one another and multiple processes can be detected acting at the same time. These results are significant for prediction of the parasite dynamics and potential mechanisms of long-term changes in the risk of cryptosporidiosis in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,317,733
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,348
of 3,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,619
of 309,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.