↓ Skip to main content

What’s the point? Golden and Labrador retrievers living in kennels do not understand human pointing gestures

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
What’s the point? Golden and Labrador retrievers living in kennels do not understand human pointing gestures
Published in
Animal Cognition, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10071-017-1098-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biagio D’Aniello, Alessandra Alterisio, Anna Scandurra, Emanuele Petremolo, Maria Rosaria Iommelli, Massimo Aria

Abstract

In many studies that have investigated whether dogs' capacities to understand human pointing gestures are aspects of evolutionary or developmental social competences, family-owned dogs have been compared to shelter dogs. However, for most of these studies, the origins of shelter dogs were unknown. Some shelter dogs may have lived with families before entering shelters, and from these past experiences, they may have learned to understand human gestures. Furthermore, there is substantial variation in the methodology and analytic approaches used in such studies (e.g. different pointing protocols, different treatment of trials with no-choice response and indoor vs. outdoor experimental arenas). Such differences in methodologies and analysis techniques used make it difficult to compare results obtained from different studies and may account for the divergent results obtained. We thus attempted to control for several parameters by carrying out a test on dynamic proximal and distal pointing. We studied eleven kennel dogs of known origin that were born and raised in a kennels with limited human interaction. This group was compared to a group of eleven dogs comparable in terms of breed, sex and age that had lived with human families since they were puppies. Our results demonstrate that pet dogs outperform kennel dogs in their comprehension of proximal and distal pointing, regardless of whether trials where no-choice was made were considered as errors or were excluded from statistical analysis, meaning that dogs living in kennels do not understand pointing gestures. Even if genetic effects of the domestication process on human-dog relationships cannot be considered as negligible, our data suggest that dogs need to learn human pointing gestures and thus underscore the importance of ontogenetic processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 25%
Psychology 18 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,299,921
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#299
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,108
of 325,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.