Title |
Application of the FEMA-P58 methodology for regional earthquake loss prediction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-016-2307-z |
Authors |
Xiang Zeng, Xinzheng Lu, T. Y. Yang, Zhen Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 59 | 55% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,013
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,302
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,011
of 301,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.