| Title |
Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minerva, January 1971
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01553188 |
| Authors |
Harriet Zuckerman, Robert K. Merton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 168 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 31% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 74 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,293,836
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#56
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190
of 16,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them