| Title |
Risk management to prioritise the eradication of new and emerging invasive non-native species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-017-1451-z |
| Authors |
Olaf Booy, Aileen C. Mill, Helen E. Roy, Alice Hiley, Niall Moore, Pete Robertson, Simon Baker, Matt Brazier, Mathilde Bue, Richard Bullock, Steve Campbell, Dominic Eyre, Jim Foster, Maggie Hatton-Ellis, Jo Long, Craig Macadam, Camilla Morrison-Bell, John Mumford, Jonathan Newman, David Parrott, Robin Payne, Trevor Renals, Eoina Rodgers, Mark Spencer, Paul Stebbing, Mike Sutton-Croft, Kevin J. Walker, Alastair Ward, Stan Whittaker, Gabe Wyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 30% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 67% |
| Scientists | 16 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Researcher | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#920,560
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#114
of 2,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,373
of 327,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.