↓ Skip to main content

Virus contaminations of cell cultures – A biotechnological view

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,026)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
Virus contaminations of cell cultures – A biotechnological view
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, June 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1022969101804
Pubmed ID
Authors

O.-W. Merten

Abstract

In contrast to contamination by microbes and mycoplasma, which can be relatively easily detected, viral contamination present a serious threat because of the difficulty in detecting some viruses and the lack of effective methods of treating infected cell cultures. While some viruses are capable of causing morphological changes to infected cells (e.g. cytopathic effect) which are detectable by microscopy some viral contaminations result in the integration of the viral genome as provirus, this causes no visual evidence, by means of modification of the cellular morphology. Virus production from such cell lines, are potentially dangerous for other cell cultures (in research labs)by cross contaminations, or for operators and patients (in the case of the production of injectable biologicals) because of potential infection. The only way to keep cell cultures for research, development, and the biotech industry virus-free is the prevention of such contaminations. Cell cultures can become contaminated by the following means: firstly, they may already be contaminated as primary cultures (because the source of the cells was already infected), secondly, they were contaminated due to the use of contaminated raw materials, or thirdly, they were contaminated via an animal passage. This overview describes the problems and risks associated with viral contaminations in animal cell culture, describes the origins of these contaminations as well as the most important virsuses associated with viral contaminations in cell culture. In addition, ways to prevent viral contaminations as well as measures undertaken to avoid and assess risks for viral contaminations as performed in the biotech industry are briefly described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Master 25 10%
Other 14 6%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 69 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 6%
Chemical Engineering 14 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 72 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,654,316
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#14
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,746
of 126,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.