↓ Skip to main content

Family Structure and Age at Menarche: A Children-of-Twins Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family Structure and Age at Menarche: A Children-of-Twins Approach
Published in
Developmental Psychology, January 2006
DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.533
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Mendle, Eric Turkheimer, Brian M. D'Onofrio, Stacy K. Lynch, Robert E. Emery, Wendy S. Slutske, Nicholas G. Martin

Abstract

Girls who grow up in households with an unrelated adult male reach menarche earlier than peers, a finding hypothesized to be an evolutionary strategy for families under stress. The authors tested the alternative hypothesis that nonrandom selection into stepfathering due to shared environmental and/or genetic predispositions creates a spurious relation between stepfathering and early menarche. Using the unique controls for genetic and shared environmental experiences offered by the children-of-twins design, the authors found that cousins discordant for stepfathering did not differ in age of menarche. Moreover, controlling for mother's age of menarche eliminated differences in menarcheal age associated with stepfathering in unrelated girls. These findings strongly suggest selection, and not causation, accounts for the relationship between stepfathering and early menarche.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,140,527
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#258
of 4,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,594
of 174,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#6
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.