↓ Skip to main content

Expanding research to provide an evidence base for nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding research to provide an evidence base for nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism
Published in
Molecular Genetics & Metabolism, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn M. Camp, Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear, Lynne Yao, Stephen C. Groft, Melissa A. Parisi, Andrew Mulberg, Rashmi Gopal-Srivastava, Stephen Cederbaum, Gregory M. Enns, Abby G. Ershow, Dianne M. Frazier, John Gohagan, Cary Harding, R. Rodney Howell, Karen Regan, Peter W. Stacpoole, Charles Venditti, Jerry Vockley, Michael Watson, Paul M. Coates

Abstract

A trans-National Institutes of Health initiative, Nutrition and Dietary Supplement Interventions for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (NDSI-IEM), was launched in 2010 to identify gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and utility of nutritional interventions for the management of inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) that need to be filled with evidence-based research. IEM include inherited biochemical disorders in which specific enzyme defects interfere with the normal metabolism of exogenous (dietary) or endogenous protein, carbohydrate, or fat. For some of these IEM, effective management depends primarily on nutritional interventions. Further research is needed to demonstrate the impact of nutritional interventions on individual health outcomes and on the psychosocial issues identified by patients and their families. A series of meetings and discussions were convened to explore the current United States' funding and regulatory infrastructure and the challenges to the conduct of research for nutritional interventions for the management of IEM. Although the research and regulatory infrastructure are well-established, a collaborative pathway that includes the professional and advocacy rare disease community and federal regulatory and research agencies will be needed to overcome current barriers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#2,014
of 2,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,393
of 208,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics & Metabolism
#29
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.