↓ Skip to main content

International survey on diagnosis and management of hypotension in extremely preterm babies

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International survey on diagnosis and management of hypotension in extremely preterm babies
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2251-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zbynek Stranak, Jana Semberova, Keith Barrington, Colm O’Donnell, Neil Marlow, Gunnar Naulaers, Eugene Dempsey, On behalf of the HIP consortium

Abstract

Hypotension is a commonly diagnosed and treated complication of extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGAN), but enormous variation in diagnosis, management and clinical practice has been documented. We sought to evaluate practice regarding the management of hypotension in ELGANs and developed a web-based questionnaire addressing diagnosis, intervention thresholds and modes of treatment of hypotension in ELGANs. We received 216 completed questionnaires from respondents in 38 countries. Most responses (83 %) were from specialist units where, together, over 26,000 very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are cared for annually. The majority (73 %) defined hypotension as a mean blood pressure (BP) in mmHg less than the gestational age in weeks. Sixty percent assessed the circulation with additional methods; echocardiography was the most commonly used (74 %), with left ventricular output and fractional shortening the two most common measurements made. The majority (85 %) used volume administration as the initial intervention. Dopamine was the inotrope most commonly used initially (80 %). If the initial inotrope therapy failed, dobutamine was the most popular second-line treatment (28 %). Delayed cord clamping was used at 51 % of the centres. Conclusion: The definition of hypotension in ELGANs continues to follow traditional standards. Functional echocardiography is now used to assess the circulation at many centres. Volume expansion and dopamine remain the most frequently used therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,934,754
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,323
of 3,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,989
of 304,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.