| Title |
Effects of long-term training specificity on maximal strength and power of the upper and lower extremities in athletes from different sports
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-002-0628-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikel Izquierdo, Keijo Häkkinen, Juan J. Gonzalez-Badillo, Javier Ibáñez, Esteban M. Gorostiaga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 397 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Professor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 95 | 23% |
| Unknown | 74 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 227 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Unknown | 87 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,884
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,362
of 126,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.