↓ Skip to main content

DNA Methylation Changes Separate Allergic Patients from Healthy Controls and May Reflect Altered CD4+ T-Cell Population Structure

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Methylation Changes Separate Allergic Patients from Healthy Controls and May Reflect Altered CD4+ T-Cell Population Structure
Published in
PLoS Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colm E. Nestor, Fredrik Barrenäs, Hui Wang, Antonio Lentini, Huan Zhang, Sören Bruhn, Rebecka Jörnsten, Michael A. Langston, Gary Rogers, Mika Gustafsson, Mikael Benson

Abstract

Altered DNA methylation patterns in CD4(+) T-cells indicate the importance of epigenetic mechanisms in inflammatory diseases. However, the identification of these alterations is complicated by the heterogeneity of most inflammatory diseases. Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is an optimal disease model for the study of DNA methylation because of its well-defined phenotype and etiology. We generated genome-wide DNA methylation (N(patients) = 8, N(controls) = 8) and gene expression (N(patients) = 9, Ncontrols = 10) profiles of CD4(+) T-cells from SAR patients and healthy controls using Illumina's HumanMethylation450 and HT-12 microarrays, respectively. DNA methylation profiles clearly and robustly distinguished SAR patients from controls, during and outside the pollen season. In agreement with previously published studies, gene expression profiles of the same samples failed to separate patients and controls. Separation by methylation (N(patients) = 12, N(controls) = 12), but not by gene expression (N(patients) = 21, N(controls) = 21) was also observed in an in vitro model system in which purified PBMCs from patients and healthy controls were challenged with allergen. We observed changes in the proportions of memory T-cell populations between patients (N(patients) = 35) and controls (N(controls) = 12), which could explain the observed difference in DNA methylation. Our data highlight the potential of epigenomics in the stratification of immune disease and represents the first successful molecular classification of SAR using CD4(+) T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,969,456
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#6,612
of 8,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,440
of 321,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#127
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.