↓ Skip to main content

Detection of HER2 Amplification in Circulating Tumor Cells of HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Detection of HER2 Amplification in Circulating Tumor Cells of HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients
Published in
Targeted Oncology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11523-017-0493-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Mishima, Satoshi Matsusaka, Keisho Chin, Mariko Mikuniya, Sayuri Minowa, Tomoko Takayama, Harumi Shibata, Ryoko Kuniyoshi, Mariko Ogura, Yasuhito Terui, Nobuyuki Mizunuma, Kiyohiko Hatake

Abstract

A key to the successful use of targeted cancer therapy is the ability to preselect patients who are likely to benefit from the treatment according to molecular markers. Assessment for predicting therapy response is mostly done using tumor biopsies. However, these might not truly represent all of the patient's malignant cells because of tumor heterogeneity and/or clonal evolution during disease progression. One potential strategy that can complement primary tumor biopsy is the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In this study, we analyzed CTCs of patients with gastric cancer (GC) to find those who were likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapies. We developed an imaging-based method that enabled CTC identification simultaneously with evaluation of HER2 gene amplification (the 3D-IF-FISH method). Then we performed a study enrolling 101 GC patients in whom we analyzed CTCs by both 3D-IF-FISH and an FDA-approved CellSearch system. As compared with the CellSearch system, 3D-IF-FISH methods identified a higher number of patients whose primary tumors were HER2- but who had HER2+ CTCs, suggesting that the 3D-IF-FISH method is effective in preselecting patients for trastuzumab therapies. To demonstrate this, we performed an exploratory clinical study to evaluate the clinical benefits of trastuzumab treatment for advanced GC patients (n = 15) whose primary tumors were HER2-, but whose CTCs showed HER2 amplification. An interim evaluation after the first stage showed that these preselected patients had response rates comparable to those reported in the trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy arm of the ToGA study. The present study offers a new, non-invasive strategy to select patients who are likely to benefit from trastuzumab-based therapies, despite their primary biopsy being HER2-negative. (UMIN ID: UMIN000008622).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,547,867
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#394
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,370
of 309,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.