↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical load exerted by PET-G aligners during mesial and distal derotation of a mandibular canine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical load exerted by PET-G aligners during mesial and distal derotation of a mandibular canine
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00056-017-0090-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Elkholy, B. Mikhaiel, F. Schmidt, B. G. Lapatki

Abstract

The six force-moment (F/M) components exerted by aligners of different thickness during simulated mesiorotation and distorotation of a mandibular canine were studied. An acrylic mandibular model with a separated right canine mounted on a hexapod via a 3D F/M sensor was used. Duran+(®) aligners (Scheu Dental, Germany) of thickness 0.5, 0.625, and 0.75 mm were fabricated on plaster models with the measurement tooth in its neutral position. The F/M values were recorded during progressive mesiorotation or distorotation of tooth 43 in 1° steps up to ±15°, corresponding to 0.5 mm displacements of the tooth's interdental contacts. Each rotation step included renewed seating of the aligner on the acrylic model. Three aligners were tested three times each for each thickness and direction of rotation. The median rotational moments for the 0.5 mm aligner and 15° distorotation of tooth 43 was 27.49 Nmm (interquartile range, IQR 1.45 Nmm). The corresponding values for the 0.625 and 0.75 mm aligners were 41.04 Nmm (IQR 5.62 Nmm) and 42.48 Nmm (IQR 2.17 Nmm), respectively. The average rotational moments for distorotation were 15% higher than for mesiorotation (p = 0.01). Relatively high collateral F/M components, specifically an intrusive force and labiolingual and mesiodistal tipping moments, were observed. To avoid overloading of periodontal structures, derotation of lower canines should be limited to 10° per setup step, leading to rotational moments of about 15 Nmm. The mechanical behavior of the 0.625 and 0.75 mm aligners were similar; thus, it may be omitted from the aligner sequence. Further studies are required to investigate specific aligner modifications or attachments for minimizing collateral F/M components or unwanted movements, respectively, during canine derotation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Researcher 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 38%
Engineering 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
#87
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,645
of 312,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.