| Title |
Ways of coping with premenstrual change: development and validation of a premenstrual coping measure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer R Read, Janette Perz, Jane M Ussher |
| Abstract |
Negative premenstrual change can result in distress for a significant proportion of women. Previous research has suggested that women employ a range of coping strategies and behaviours in order to manage and reduce premenstrual distress. However, as yet there has been no specific scale available to measure premenstrual coping. This research aimed to develop and validate a measure of premenstrual coping which can be used in future investigations of negative premenstrual experience. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 19 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,149,825
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,474
of 1,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,209
of 307,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.