↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice: immune thrombocytopenia in paediatrics

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Clinical practice: immune thrombocytopenia in paediatrics
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00431-013-2254-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veerle Labarque, Chris Van Geet

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease affecting both children and adults. It is defined as acquired isolated thrombocytopenia caused by the autoimmune production of anti-platelet antibodies. Childhood ITP most frequently occurs in young children who have been previously well, although a viral respiratory tract infection often precedes thrombocytopenia. A benign and self-limiting course is common, but major bleeding complications such as intracranial haemorrhage may occur. Yet one cannot predict which child will have a prolonged course of thrombocytopenia and who will develop an intracranial haemorrhage. In children without atypical characteristics, only minimal diagnostic investigations are needed, and most paediatric ITP patients do not need platelet-enhancing therapy even though various treatment options are available. A "watch and wait" strategy should be considered in paediatric patients with mild disease. Steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin G or anti-D immunoglobulin are the current first-line therapeutic measures for children at risk for severe bleeding. When life-threatening bleeding occurs, a combination of therapies is needed. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge on primary ITP in children and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Researcher 12 14%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,109,607
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#504
of 3,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,268
of 304,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.