↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic and germline gene correction to restore hemostasis in hemophilia B mice

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic and germline gene correction to restore hemostasis in hemophilia B mice
Published in
Human Genetics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00439-017-1801-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cong Huai, Chenqiang Jia, Ruilin Sun, Peipei Xu, Taishan Min, Qihan Wang, Chengde Zheng, Hongyan Chen, Daru Lu

Abstract

Hemophilia B (HB) is an X-linked disorder caused by defects of F9 encoded coagulation factor IX, which is an ideal model for gene therapy. Most existing HB gene therapies are based on viral mediated gene supplementation, which could increase immunoreaction. In this study, CRISPR/Cas9 system was used for gene correction in an F9 mutant HB mouse model in both adult mice (in vivo) and in germline cells (ex vivo). In vivo, naked Cas9-sgRNA plasmid and donor DNA were delivered to HB mice livers to recover the mutation via hydrodynamic tail vein (HTV) injection. 62.5% of the HTV-treated mice showed a detectable gene correction (>1%) in the F9 alleles of hepatocytes, which was sufficient to remit the coagulation deficiency. Ex vivo, three different forms of Cas9 were microinjected into germline cells of HB mice to investigate their efficiency and safety in gene correction. Cas9 protein showed higher gene recovery rates, less embryo toxicity, and lower mosaic repair percentage, making it more suitable for germline gene therapy. Our study strongly supports that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing is feasible in gene therapy of genetic disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,549,805
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#430
of 3,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,388
of 315,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.