↓ Skip to main content

The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Women
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9543-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori A. Brotto

Abstract

Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) is one of two sexual desire disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and is defined by the monosymptomatic criterion "persistently or recurrently deficient (or absent) sexual fantasies and desire for sexual activity" that causes "marked distress or interpersonal difficulty." This article reviews the diagnosis of HSDD in prior and current (DSM-IV-TR) editions of the DSM, critiques the existing criteria, and proposes criteria for consideration in DSM-V. Problems in coming to a clear operational definition of desire, the fact that sexual activity often occurs in the absence of desire for women, conceptual issues in understanding untriggered versus responsive desire, the relative infrequency of unprovoked sexual fantasies in women, and the significant overlap between desire and arousal are reviewed and highlight the need for revised DSM criteria for HSDD that accurately reflect women's experiences. The article concludes with the recommendation that desire and arousal be combined into one disorder with polythetic criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#863,933
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#457
of 3,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,145
of 107,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.