↓ Skip to main content

Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Happiness Studies, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
698 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
954 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions
Published in
Journal of Happiness Studies, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
Authors

Veronika Huta, Alan S. Waterman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 954 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 946 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 176 18%
Student > Master 170 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 8%
Student > Bachelor 71 7%
Researcher 45 5%
Other 175 18%
Unknown 238 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 311 33%
Social Sciences 100 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 92 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 2%
Arts and Humanities 16 2%
Other 136 14%
Unknown 276 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,304,656
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Happiness Studies
#177
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,054
of 326,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Happiness Studies
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.