↓ Skip to main content

Cuff Pressure of Endotracheal Tubes After Changes in Body Position in Critically Ill Patients Treated With Mechanical Ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Critical Care, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cuff Pressure of Endotracheal Tubes After Changes in Body Position in Critically Ill Patients Treated With Mechanical Ventilation
Published in
American Journal of Critical Care, January 2014
DOI 10.4037/ajcc2014489
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christelle Lizy, Walter Swinnen, Sonia Labeau, Jan Poelaert, Dirk Vogelaers, Koenraad Vandewoude, Joel Dulhunty, Stijn Blot

Abstract

In order to avoid microaspiration and tracheal injury, the target for endotracheal tube cuff pressure is 20 to 30 cm H2O.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 32 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,162,000
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Critical Care
#182
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,022
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Critical Care
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.