↓ Skip to main content

The low-carbohydrate diet and cardiovascular risk factors: Evidence from epidemiologic studies

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,987)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
141 X users
facebook
18 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The low-carbohydrate diet and cardiovascular risk factors: Evidence from epidemiologic studies
Published in
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.12.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Hu, L.A. Bazzano

Abstract

Obesity is an important public health issue because of its high prevalence and concomitant increase in risk of cardiovascular diseases. Low carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss and weight management but are not recommended in leading guidelines due to the perception that increases in dietary fat intake may lead to an adverse cardiovascular risk profile. To clarify the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet for weight loss on cardiovascular disease risk factors as compared to a low fat diet for weight loss, we systematically reviewed data from randomized controlled clinical trials and large observational studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 141 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 328 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 20%
Student > Bachelor 58 17%
Researcher 40 12%
Other 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 63 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 74 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#251,147
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#25
of 1,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,240
of 321,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.