↓ Skip to main content

Market-Based Higher Education: Does Colorado’s Voucher Model Improve Higher Education Access and Efficiency?

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Higher Education, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Market-Based Higher Education: Does Colorado’s Voucher Model Improve Higher Education Access and Efficiency?
Published in
Research in Higher Education, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11162-013-9326-3
Authors

Nicholas W. Hillman, David A. Tandberg, Jacob P. K. Gross

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Turkey 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 22%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 47%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 15%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,425,553
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#231
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,207
of 304,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.