↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10552-007-9083-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Etzioni, Alex Tsodikov, Angela Mariotto, Aniko Szabo, Seth Falcon, Jake Wegelin, Dante diTommaso, Kent Karnofski, Roman Gulati, David F. Penson, Eric Feuer

Abstract

To quantify the plausible contribution of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening to the nearly 30% decline in the US prostate cancer mortality rate observed during the 1990s. Two mathematical modeling teams of the US National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network independently projected disease mortality in the absence and presence of PSA screening. Both teams relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data for disease incidence, used common estimates of PSA screening rates, and assumed that screening, by shifting disease from distant to local-regional clinical stage, confers a corresponding improvement in disease-specific survival. The teams projected similar mortality increases in the absence of screening and decreases in the presence of screening after 1985. By 2000, the models projected that 45% (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) to 70% (University of Michigan) of the observed decline in prostate cancer mortality could be plausibly attributed to the stage shift induced by screening. PSA screening may account for much, but not all, of the observed drop in prostate cancer mortality. Other factors, such as changing treatment practices, may also have played a role in improving prostate cancer outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Master 13 7%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Computer Science 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,677,385
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#157
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,160
of 169,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.