You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Offline Memory Reprocessing: Involvement of the Brain's Default Network in Spontaneous Thought Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004867 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kun Wang, Chunshui Yu, Lijuan Xu, Wen Qin, Kuncheng Li, Lin Xu, Tianzi Jiang |
| Abstract |
Spontaneous thought processes (STPs), also called daydreaming or mind-wandering, occur ubiquitously in daily life. However, the functional significance of STPs remains largely unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 34% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,109,607
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,878
of 194,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,351
of 106,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#119
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.