↓ Skip to main content

Defining and understanding the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional responsibility: implications for educating health and social care students

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Defining and understanding the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional responsibility: implications for educating health and social care students
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10459-017-9778-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viktoria C. T. Joynes

Abstract

This paper is concerned with exploring the relationship between perceptions of professional identities, interprofessional education (IPE) and collaborative practice. It seeks to introduce the concept of interprofessional responsibility as both a shift in the way in which to conceptualise the professional identity of Health and Social Care (H&SC) staff and as a new set of practices that help to inform the way in which students are prepared for collaborative working. The presented research, undertaken as part of a Ph.D. study, is based upon semi-structured interviews (n = 33) with H&SC staff who were recruited from both the United Kingdom (UK) Health Service and UK universities. Drawing upon thematic analysis of the data, the results of the research identified that previous conceptualisations of professional identity aligned to a whole profession do not relate to the way in which professionals perceive their identities. Senior professionals claimed to be more comfortable with their own professional identity, and with working across professional boundaries, than junior colleagues. Academic staff also identified that much IPE currently taught in universities serves the purpose of box-ticking rather than being delivered in meaningful way. It is proposed that the findings have implications for the way in which IPE is currently taught, and that adoption of the proposed concept of 'interprofessional responsibility' may help address some of the concerns these findings raise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Lecturer 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 87 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 43 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Psychology 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 95 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,483,718
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#333
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,403
of 314,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.