↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association analysis identifies 11 risk variants associated with the asthma with hay fever phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association analysis identifies 11 risk variants associated with the asthma with hay fever phenotype
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel A.R. Ferreira, Melanie C. Matheson, Clara S. Tang, Raquel Granell, Wei Ang, Jennie Hui, Amy K. Kiefer, David L. Duffy, Svetlana Baltic, Patrick Danoy, Minh Bui, Loren Price, Peter D. Sly, Nicholas Eriksson, Pamela A. Madden, Michael J. Abramson, Patrick G. Holt, Andrew C. Heath, Michael Hunter, Bill Musk, Colin F. Robertson, Peter Le Souëf, Grant W. Montgomery, A. John Henderson, Joyce Y. Tung, Shyamali C. Dharmage, Matthew A. Brown, Alan James, Philip J. Thompson, Craig Pennell, Nicholas G. Martin, David M. Evans, David A. Hinds, John L. Hopper, Australian Asthma Genetics Consortium Collaborators

Abstract

To date, no genome-wide association study (GWAS) has considered the combined phenotype of asthma with hay fever. Previous analyses of family data from the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study provide evidence that this phenotype has a stronger genetic cause than asthma without hay fever.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 167 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#679,115
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#557
of 11,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,965
of 318,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#11
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.