↓ Skip to main content

In the Real-World, Kids Use Medications and Devices

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs - Real World Outcomes, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
In the Real-World, Kids Use Medications and Devices
Published in
Drugs - Real World Outcomes, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40801-017-0106-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamar Lasky

Abstract

In the real world, we lack evidence guiding the use of medications and devices in children. This lack of evidence arose out of the challenges of conducting clinical trials in children and other vulnerable populations and the historical decision (reversed in recent decades) to exclude children from clinical trials. The recent focus on the potential of real-world evidence (RWE) to guide approval and use of new treatments may provide a much-needed solution. A broad definition of RWE includes prospective observational data and data from electronic health records and claims, as well as other sources. For the most part, it is reasonable to expect that considerations around the use of RWE in adult populations will apply to its use in children. However, a number of issues around the use of RWE are unique to studying children. These fall into at least four categories: (1) identification of databases with adequate numbers of children in the age sub-groups of interest, (2) access to critical variables such as birth date, birth weight, and gestational age, (3) linkage to parental records for information about pre-natal exposures, family history, and socio-economic status, and (4) linkage to school records for information about outcomes such as missed school days, academic progress, and behavioral issues. Addressing the needs of children in developing methodologies for use of RWE ensures that ongoing efforts will benefit children as well as other sectors of the population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,547,867
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Drugs - Real World Outcomes
#145
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,993
of 313,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs - Real World Outcomes
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.