↓ Skip to main content

Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Clinical, Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of 42 Cases with Emphasis on Stromal Features

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma: A Clinical, Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of 42 Cases with Emphasis on Stromal Features
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12105-017-0824-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celeste Sánchez-Romero, Roman Carlos, Juan Pablo Díaz Molina, Lester D. R. Thompson, Oslei Paes de Almeida, Alicia Rumayor Piña

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal angiofibroma is a benign but aggressive tumor of unknown etiology, typically occurring in adolescent males. It is described as a rare neoplasm; however, the prevalence seems to have geographic differences. All cases referred to our head and neck clinical and pathology service were reviewed. Most of the patients presented at an advanced stage. The clinical and radiographic features are presented and discussed. Histologically, the tumor shows a highly vascular fibrous proliferation with characteristic plump, angulated and stellate cells, categorized as fibroblasts. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 42 cases to further elucidate the nature of these cells. The stromal cells expressed vimentin and factor XIIIa, the latter expressed most commonly in the giant stellate cells. Inflammation was almost exclusively present in peripheral subepithelial areas. Mast cells were abundant, even in the absence of other inflammatory cells. Lymphatics were observed principally in peripheral regions. Proliferating cells (Ki-67 reactive) were restricted to endothelial cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 47%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,763,444
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#406
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,058
of 309,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.