↓ Skip to main content

The winding path of protein methylation research: milestones and new frontiers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The winding path of protein methylation research: milestones and new frontiers
Published in
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrm.2017.35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jernej Murn, Yang Shi

Abstract

In 1959, while analysing the bacterial flagellar proteins, Ambler and Rees observed an unknown species of amino acid that they eventually identified as methylated lysine. Over half a century later, protein methylation is known to have a regulatory role in many essential cellular processes that range from gene transcription to signal transduction. However, the road to this now burgeoning research field was obstacle-ridden, not least because of the inconspicuous nature of the methyl mark itself. Here, we chronicle the milestone achievements and discuss the future of protein methylation research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 23%
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 83 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 18%
Chemistry 23 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 63 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,118,877
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#591
of 2,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,001
of 314,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.