↓ Skip to main content

Effects of tree and herb biodiversity on Diptera, a hyperdiverse insect order

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Effects of tree and herb biodiversity on Diptera, a hyperdiverse insect order
Published in
Oecologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2865-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Scherber, Elke A. Vockenhuber, Andreas Stark, Hans Meyer, Teja Tscharntke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Réunion 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 50%
Environmental Science 24 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,527
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,262
of 321,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#24
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.