Title |
Opinions of Students from a Brazilian Medical School Regarding Online Professionalism
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2748-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paulo Novis Rocha, Naara Alethéa Azael de Castro |
Abstract |
Unprofessional online behavior by medical students or physicians may damage individual careers, and the reputation of institutions and the medical profession. What is considered unprofessional online behavior, however, is not clearly defined and may vary in different cultures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 30% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 47% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#14,759,948
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,426
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,596
of 312,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#47
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.