You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancing psychotherapy and evidence‐based psychological interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mpr.1411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul M.G. Emmelkamp, Daniel David, Tom Beckers, Peter Muris, Pim Cuijpers, Wolfgang Lutz, Gerhard Andersson, Ricardo Araya, Rosa M. Banos Rivera, Michael Barkham, Matthias Berking, Thomas Berger, Christina Botella, Per Carlbring, Francesc Colom, Cecilia Essau, Dirk Hermans, Stefan G. Hofmann, Susanne Knappe, Thomas H. Ollendick, Filip Raes, Winfried Rief, Heleen Riper, Saskia Van Der Oord, Bram Vervliet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| Japan | 4 | 12% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 397 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 15% |
| Researcher | 62 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 91 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 205 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Unknown | 120 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,656,105
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#27
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,120
of 324,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.