↓ Skip to main content

Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, July 2017
DOI 10.1111/jpm.12399
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Olasoji, P. Maude, K. McCauley

Abstract

The literature reporting experiences of relatives of people with mental illness regarding their interactions with mental health services identifies many commonalities. However, the actual experience of carers engaging the services and understanding health care systems remains a gap in the literature. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of carers (of people with a severe mental illness) in a major area mental health service in Victoria Australia as they fulfil their caring role whilst negotiating support for their relative. A carer is defined as a family member or significant other who is the primary individual who provides informal care for a person with severe mental illness and may or may not be in receipt of income supplement for such a role. Specifically this study has a focus on the experience of the carer when negotiating care needs or admission with a mental health service. A qualitative descriptive approach was used with five focus groups as a means of data collection. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from both the hospital and universities ethics committees. Key themes identified using thematic analysis are presented in the words of the carers and include: "Juggling between services; We became assertive and If only they would listen. Often carers were advocating for their relative and needing to negotiate between services (police and crisis assessment teams) to gain any form of assessment or intervention. Carers often spent a great deal of time on the phone to services only to be told that their relative was "not sick enough" to access care or that no response would occur without another service also being involved DISCUSSION: Our research highlights the importance of working collaboratively with informal carers and acknowledging their valuable contribution to the care of their relatives with a severe mental illness. It is very important that adequate support is given to carers especially during the period when their relatives are experiencing a crisis. An understanding of their experiences ensures a more family focused approach towards care. The study findings should enable the health care team to focus attention on the issues which are most pertinent to carers. Nurses are advocates not only for the patient but also for their families. Carers supporting a person who experiences mental illness can often find themselves in difficult and emotionally challenging situations such as at times of crisis and admission to mental health services. The fourth and latest Australian National Mental Health Plan (2009-2014) acknowledged these concerns and highlighted the need to recognise the role of carers in promoting wellbeing and recovery of the relative with a mental illness. The plan acknowledges that families are often best placed to recognise signs of relapse in their family members with a mental illness and discharge planning should include the involvement of family members (Commonwealth of Australia, 2009). To achieve best care outcomes for consumers, mental health nurses need to recognise the role of the carer and collaborate in care planning. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 59 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 35 20%
Psychology 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 64 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,294,797
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#52
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,675
of 326,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.