You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
X-ray Investigation on Tutankhamen's Golden Mask
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Materia Japan, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2320/materia.47.355 |
| Authors |
M Uda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 24% |
| China | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,380,183
of 25,123,616 outputs
Outputs from Materia Japan
#2
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,352
of 169,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materia Japan
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.