↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterial mistranslation is necessary and sufficient for rifampicin phenotypic resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycobacterial mistranslation is necessary and sufficient for rifampicin phenotypic resistance
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1317580111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babak Javid, Flavia Sorrentino, Melody Toosky, Wen Zheng, Jessica T. Pinkham, Nina Jain, Miaomiao Pan, Padraig Deighan, Eric J. Rubin

Abstract

Errors are inherent in all biological systems. Errors in protein translation are particularly frequent giving rise to a collection of protein quasi-species, the diversity of which will vary according to the error rate. As mistranslation rates rise, these new proteins could produce new phenotypes, although none have been identified to date. Here, we find that mycobacteria substitute glutamate for glutamine and aspartate for asparagine at high rates under specific growth conditions. Increasing the substitution rate results in remarkable phenotypic resistance to rifampicin, whereas decreasing mistranslation produces increased susceptibility to the antibiotic. These phenotypic changes are reflected in differential susceptibility of RNA polymerase to the drug. We propose that altering translational fidelity represents a unique form of environmental adaptation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 223 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Master 33 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#6,249,030
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#57,021
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,677
of 316,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#534
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.