Title |
Genome-wide evidence of Austronesian–Bantu admixture and cultural reversion in a hunter-gatherer group of Madagascar
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1321860111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Denis Pierron, Harilanto Razafindrazaka, Luca Pagani, François-Xavier Ricaut, Tiago Antao, Mélanie Capredon, Clément Sambo, Chantal Radimilahy, Jean-Aimé Rakotoarisoa, Roger M. Blench, Thierry Letellier, Toomas Kivisild |
Abstract |
Linguistic and cultural evidence suggest that Madagascar was the final point of two major dispersals of Austronesian- and Bantu-speaking populations. Today, the Mikea are described as the last-known Malagasy population reported to be still practicing a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. It is unclear, however, whether the Mikea descend from a remnant population that existed before the arrival of Austronesian and Bantu agriculturalists or whether it is only their lifestyle that separates them from the other contemporary populations of South Madagascar. To address these questions we have performed a genome-wide analysis of >700,000 SNP markers on 21 Mikea, 24 Vezo, and 24 Temoro individuals, together with 50 individuals from Bajo and Lebbo populations from Indonesia. Our analyses of these data in the context of data available from other Southeast Asian and African populations reveal that all three Malagasy populations are derived from the same admixture event involving Austronesian and Bantu sources. In contrast to the fact that most of the vocabulary of the Malagasy speakers is derived from the Barito group of the Austronesian language family, we observe that only one-third of their genetic ancestry is related to the populations of the Java-Kalimantan-Sulawesi area. Because no additional ancestry components distinctive for the Mikea were found, it is likely that they have adopted their hunter-gatherer way of life through cultural reversion, and selection signals suggest a genetic adaptation to their new lifestyle. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 93 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |