| Title |
Solubility of pharmaceuticals: A comparison between SciPharma, a PC-SAFT-based approach, and NRTL-SAC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60225-5 |
| Authors |
Baptiste Bouillot, Theodora Spyriouni, Sébastien Teychené, Béatrice Biscans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 36% |
| Engineering | 5 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#135
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,905
of 323,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.