↓ Skip to main content

Inter-trabecular bone formation: a specific mechanism for healing of cancellous bone

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Orthopaedica, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inter-trabecular bone formation: a specific mechanism for healing of cancellous bone
Published in
Acta Orthopaedica, June 2016
DOI 10.1080/17453674.2016.1205172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olof H Sandberg, Per Aspenberg

Abstract

Background and purpose - Studies of fracture healing have mainly dealt with shaft fractures, both experimentally and clinically. In contrast, most patients have metaphyseal fractures. There is an increasing awareness that metaphyseal fractures heal partly through mechanisms specific to cancellous bone. Several new models for the study of cancellous bone healing have recently been presented. This review summarizes our current knowledge of cancellous fracture healing. Methods - We performed a review of the literature after doing a systematic literature search. Results - Cancellous bone appears to heal mainly via direct, membranous bone formation that occurs freely in the marrow, probably mostly arising from local stem cells. This mechanism appears to be specific for cancellous bone, and could be named inter-trabecular bone formation. This kind of bone formation is spatially restricted and does not extend more than a few mm outside the injured region. Usually no cartilage is seen, although external callus and cartilage formation can be induced in meta-physeal fractures by mechanical instability. Inter-trabecular bone formation seems to be less sensitive to anti-inflammatory treatment than shaft fractures. Interpretation - The unique characteristics of inter-trabecular bone formation in metaphyseal fractures can lead to differences from shaft healing regarding the effects of age, loading, or drug treatment. This casts doubt on generalizations about fracture healing based solely on shaft fracture models.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Engineering 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 33 34%