↓ Skip to main content

Complete Circumferential Osseous Extension in the Acetabular Rim Occurs Regardless of Acetabular Coverage

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Complete Circumferential Osseous Extension in the Acetabular Rim Occurs Regardless of Acetabular Coverage
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11999-017-5381-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keisuke Watarai, Fumihiko Kimura, Yuho Kadono, Yoon Taek Kim, Mamoru Niitsu, Hiromi Oda, Hirohiko Azuma

Abstract

Complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim has been reported to occur in the deep hip with pincer impingement. However, this phenomenon occasionally is observed in dysplastic hips without pincer impingement, and the degree to which this finding might or might not be associated with hip pain, and how often it occurs bilaterally among patients, are not well characterized. (1) To determine the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim using three-dimensional (3-D) CT in patients with and without hip pain who had CT scans obtained for various reasons. (2) To elucidate how often this complete circumferential osseous extension occurred bilaterally among those patients. (3) To investigate the relationship between the proportions of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension observed on CT scans among three different acetabular coverage groups: dysplasia, normal, and overcoverage. (4) To determine how often the finding of hip pain was associated with complete circumferential osseous extension. Between September 2011 to July 2016, we evaluated 3788 patients with pelvic complaints such as hip, groin, thigh, buttock, or sacroiliac joint pain. We obtained consent from 26% (992 of 3788) of them, and obtained 3-D CT scans as part of that evaluation. For the current retrospective study, we excluded patients younger than 20 years or 80 years or older (181 patients), patients who had previous hip surgery (185 patients), patients with severe osteoarthritis with Tönnis Grades 2 or 3 (301 patients), and patients who could not have an accurate lateral center-edge (LCE) angle measured owing to poor-quality radiographs (24 patients), leaving 301 patients (602 hips) for this analysis. In this study population, patients reported pain in 131 hips (22%), defined as all types of hip pain except for trauma, including activity pain, pain with sports, pain on motion, and impingement pain; the others did not report hip pain. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 16 years, and the mean LCE angle was 26° ± 8° (range, -9° to 47°). We first determined the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim using 3-D CT for those with and without hip pain who had CT obtained for various reasons. We next elucidated how often this complete circumferential osseous extension occurred bilaterally among the patients, and finally we investigated the relationship between the proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension observed on CT scans among the three groups: dysplasia (defined as LCE angles of 22° or smaller), normal, and overcoverage (defined as LCE angles of 34° or larger) groups. We finally determined how often the finding was associated with hip pain attributable to complete circumferential osseous extension. The proportion of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension was 6% (18 of 301 patients). Eighty-nine percent (16 of 18) of the patients had bilateral complete circumferential osseous extension. There were no differences in the proportions of patients with complete circumferential osseous extension among the three groups: 5.3% (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.45-2.31; p = 0.97), 5.3%, and 7.4% (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.28-1.73; p = 0.44) in the dysplasia, normal, and overcoverage groups, respectively, with the numbers available. Eighteen percent (six of 34) of the hips with complete circumferential osseous extension had pain. Complete circumferential osseous extension in the acetabular rim is relatively uncommon. When it occurs, it usually is bilateral, it occurs regardless of acetabular coverage, and it is associated with pain in a minority of patients. Level III, prognostic study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,207,253
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,314
of 7,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,315
of 325,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#18
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.