↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in mechanisms of cardiac excitation–contraction coupling

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Sex differences in mechanisms of cardiac excitation–contraction coupling
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00424-013-1233-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randi J. Parks, Susan E. Howlett

Abstract

The incidence and expression of cardiovascular diseases differs between the sexes. This is not surprising, as cardiac physiology differs between men and women. Clinical and basic science investigations have shown important sex differences in cardiac structure and function. The pervasiveness of sex differences suggests that such differences must be fundamental, likely operating at a cellular level. Indeed, studies have shown that isolated ventricular myocytes from female animals have smaller and slower contractions and underlying calcium transients compared to males. Recent evidence suggests that this arises from sex differences in components of the cardiac excitation-contraction coupling pathway, the sequence of events linking myocyte depolarization to calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and subsequent contraction. The concept that sex hormones may regulate intracellular calcium at the level of the cardiomyocyte is important, as levels of these hormones decline in both men and women as the incidence of cardiovascular disease rises. This review focuses on the impact of sex on cardiac contraction, in particular at the cellular level, and highlights specific components of the excitation-contraction coupling pathway that differ between the sexes. Understanding sex hormone regulation of calcium homeostasis in the heart may reveal new avenues for therapeutic strategies to treat cardiac dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Engineering 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,557
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,136
of 193,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.