↓ Skip to main content

An exploration of the influences on clinical decision making and the culture of blood transfusion practise in cancer-related anaemia using an ethnographic methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
An exploration of the influences on clinical decision making and the culture of blood transfusion practise in cancer-related anaemia using an ethnographic methodology
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00520-009-0801-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liz Bishop, Sara Faithfull, Helen Allan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,889
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,033
of 165,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.