You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a model of spray–canopy interactions: Interception, shatter, bounce and retention of droplets on horizontal leaves
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Modelling, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.002 |
| Authors |
Gary J. Dorr, Daryl M. Kempthorne, Lisa C. Mayo, W. Alison Forster, Jerzy A. Zabkiewicz, Scott W. McCue, John A. Belward, Ian W. Turner, Jim Hanan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 37% |
| Engineering | 10 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#1,492
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,805
of 265,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.